![]() As such, our understanding of a range of evolutionary events is undermined, and our ability to reconstruct evolutionary history is limited. Furthermore, we have no idea about the distribution or influence of these phenomena. These problematic phenomena are acknowledged to exist, but they have been largely ignored morphological data are routinely taken at 'face value' and are treated as equivalent by both molecular and palaeontological studies. Developmental and functional linkage can result in suites or modules of non-independent morphological characters and thus misleading patterns with respect to phylogeny reconstruction. Although morphology is acknowledged to be essential for phylogeny, it is also widely recognized as intrinsically problematic. It is also the only way to include extinct taxa, and therefore provide a deep time perspective fossils break up large gaps between the depauperate modern fauna, unlock sequences of evolutionary change (so called 'missing links') and provide a timescale for estimating evolutionary rates, including calibration of molecular clocks. ![]() It enables us to make the link between organisms and their environment and thus demonstrate the mechanisms of evolutionary change. As such, they address major questions, such as, how and when did our modern biota come into being, and what is the shape and distribution of biodiversity and extinction? Advances in the acquisition and analysis of genetic sequence data have led to an increasing emphasis and reliance on molecular phylogenies, yet phenotypic evidence (morphology) remains vital. Phylogenetic trees underpin reconstructions of evolutionary history and tests of evolutionary hypotheses. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |